Any day now, the CFTC will make a decision as to when the rules for Swap Execution Facilities (SEFs) will come into force. These rules will drive trading of interest rate swaps and credit default swaps onto several new electronic trading platforms, all within a short time frame.
Setting up electronic trading for OTC markets such as fixed income, however, is more complex than trading on exchanges.
Looking at the dealer-to-client (D2C) markets as an example, dealers need to establish relationships and connections with both the trading venue and their clients before they can trade on an electronic platform like SEFs. In order to reach their entire client base, dealers will need to access several trading venues at the same time.
[Related: "Interest Rate Swap Futures: Finally the Right Time"]
Further, these relationships can get quite detailed, with specific controls governing which products can be traded. In addition, other information, such as sales coverage, needs to be configured in the trading venues’ systems.
Manual Process
It is vital that this area of the business is managed carefully, but managing these trading relationships is complex and involved. Yet today, enabling a client to trade with a dealer on these OTC trading venues is largely a manual process. Each trading venue has its own user admin screen, where the dealer’s client administration staff key in the details of each client trading relationship, often manually entering the same data multiple times when the relationship is replicated across multiple venues.
Comments | Post a Comment
7 Comments to "Dodd-Frank: The Problem With Switching On the SEFs":
barney
06 March 2013
Dear Alex,
you seem to assume that sef will all be electronic. My understanding is that this is one of the most controversial aspects of the current negotiations on the SEF rule ("any means of interstate commerce" says Dodd-Frank.). Electronic trading will progress independently whether SEF rules require it or not.
Comments (16)
fblum
06 March 2013
Thanks. However, I would like to know more about TESI. Except etradingsoftware.com, there are no websites explaining what this initiative is about, and what are the financial entities involved.
Comments (1)
wolcougha
06 March 2013
Hi Barney. Electronic Trading is definitely progressing and the enablement issue isn't limited to just IRS and CDS on SEFs.. It covers most OTC markets. I think it would be fair to say that the dealers foresee a big enough move to electronic trading for IRS/CDS to do something about it now..
Comments (3)
barney
06 March 2013
wolcougha, my point exactly. and without the straightjacket of a SEF, it will provide more utility, more quickly.
Comments (16)
wolcougha
06 March 2013
Hi fblum. We do have a small amount of information in the Projects area on our website but please do contact us directly if you would like to know more.
Comments (3)
Carveout
06 March 2013
Alex,
It was my understanding that FIX was going to be utilized to trade Swaps much like they are utilized to trade equities and other asset classes. Are you referring to more standardization of T&Cs using something like XML? This sounds all too familiar as in the same problem that spawned a solutions called EMSs and FIX standardized APIs.
wolcougha
06 March 2013
Hi Carveout. The trading protocols have already been covered. There has been some good work done by FIX Protocol Ltd and FpML. The focus of TESI is not about describing the instrument and trading the instrument, but simply the process of enabling the trading relationship.
Comments (3)